Operator Comparison
Meta vs Amazon Web Services
Meta and Amazon Web Services represent two fundamentally different AI infrastructure strategies. Meta builds and owns its AI infrastructure exclusively for internal model training and inference, investing in massive GPU clusters for its open-weight Llama models. AWS provides AI infrastructure as a commercial service to thousands of enterprises, offering GPU clusters, managed training environments, and custom Trainium silicon. This comparison shows their direct facility footprints.
Meta
Facilities20
Capacity15.8 GW
Countries5
vs
Amazon Web Services
Facilities44
Capacity14.1 GW
Countries27
Scale Comparison
Status Breakdown
Meta
Operational10
Under Construction6
Announced2
Planned2
Amazon Web Services
Operational31
Planned6
Under Construction5
Announced2
Energy Mix
Meta
Renewable12
Mixed2
Nuclear2
Clean and renewable energy matched2
Nuclear power supply1
Clean energy matched1
Amazon Web Services
Renewable14
Unknown8
Mixed5
Grid3
Nuclear power supply2
Energy procurement not disclosed at facility level2
Nuclear / PJM grid supply1
Grid / utility infrastructure1
Grid (SP Group — Singapore national grid)1
Grid (KSA utility power)1
Hydroelectric1
LNG power-plant-adjacent1
Renewable energy matched at AWS region level1
Renewable energy matched1
Renewable / grid1
Facility-level energy not disclosed1
Top Countries for Meta
United States16 facilities
Sweden1 facility
Denmark1 facility
Ireland1 facility
India1 facility
Top Countries for Amazon Web Services
United States12 facilities
India3 facilities
Japan2 facilities
Australia2 facilities
South Korea2 facilities
Largest in Meta
Frequently asked questions
- How does Meta compare to Amazon Web Services in AI infrastructure?
- Meta has 20 tracked facilities with 15.8 GW selected tracked capacity. Amazon Web Services has 44 facilities with 14.1 GW. The comparison includes status breakdown, energy profile, and geographic distribution.
Build Your Own Comparison
Use the interactive comparison tool to compare any two operators, countries, continents, energy types, or status categories.
More Comparisons
Pre-built analyses for the most-watched AI infrastructure matchups.
United States vs ChinacountriesMicrosoft vs GoogleoperatorsMicrosoft vs Amazon Web ServicesoperatorsGoogle vs Amazon Web ServicesoperatorsNorth America vs EuropecontinentsRenewable vs NuclearenergyMeta vs GoogleoperatorsUnited States vs JapancountriesUnited States vs United KingdomcountriesNVIDIA vs MicrosoftoperatorsUnited States vs IndiacountriesAsia vs North AmericacontinentsOracle vs MicrosoftoperatorsUnited States vs GermanycountriesOperational vs Under ConstructionstatusesMicrosoft vs MetaoperatorsChina vs JapancountriesEurope vs AsiacontinentsJapan vs South KoreacountriesSaudi Arabia vs United Arab EmiratescountriesIndia vs JapancountriesUnited Kingdom vs GermanycountriesSingapore vs JapancountriesGoogle vs MetaoperatorsCoreWeave vs OracleoperatorsAmazon Web Services vs OracleoperatorsFrance vs GermanycountriesIndia vs ChinacountriesAustralia vs JapancountriesFrance vs United KingdomcountriesCanada vs United StatescountriesMalaysia vs SingaporecountriesGoogle vs OracleoperatorsOpenAI vs MicrosoftoperatorsNVIDIA vs GoogleoperatorsAmazon Web Services vs MicrosoftoperatorsEquinix vs Digital RealtyoperatorsNuclear vs FossilenergyOpenAI vs GoogleoperatorsCoreWeave vs GoogleoperatorsSouth Korea vs AustraliacountriesNetherlands vs GermanycountriesIndonesia vs MalaysiacountriesIndia vs IndonesiacountriesNorway vs SwedencountriesAnthropic vs OpenAIoperatorsApple vs GoogleoperatorsByteDance vs MetaoperatorsBaidu vs MicrosoftoperatorsTencent vs BaiduoperatorsTesla vs NVIDIAoperatorsCoreWeave vs MicrosoftoperatorsBrazil vs United StatescountriesTaiwan vs South KoreacountriesIreland vs NetherlandscountriesUnited Arab Emirates vs IndiacountriesItaly vs FrancecountriesMiddle East vs EuropecontinentsSouth America vs North AmericacontinentsMixed vs RenewableenergyHydroelectric vs Nuclearenergy